Independent Scientists Claim That We Are Living In 1722, Not In 2019

TimeToday more and more independent scientists come to the conclusion that three centuries have been lost in the history of mankind. But how did it happen and why?

Remove ads with Anomalien PLUS+

Experts based on the study of many historical documents came to the conclusion that in the period from the 8th to the 11th centuries, chronological events are inconsistent, vague, imprecise and very poor, as if they were simply made up.

There are irrefutable documents indicating the loss of three centuries. Thus, the grandiose construction in Constantinople of that period was for some reason abruptly suspended … for three centuries and then suddenly resumed.

Exactly the same absurdity can be traced when building the Aachen Cathedral in Germany. And there are too many inconsistencies.

Remove ads with Anomalien PLUS+

This huge leap in history’s timeline may have been a result of some confusion when the Pope switched from the Julian calendar to the Gregorian calendar in 1582 A.D., where there was a discrepancy of at least 10 days.

“Maybe there was a misinterpretation of documents somewhere along the line, as forged historical documents aren’t necessarily rare. But maybe it was no accident at all.”, said Nikol Ertman, a professor at Tallinn University.

The phantom time hypothesis is a theory asserted by Heribert Illig and first published in 1991. It hypothesizes a conspiracy by the Holy Roman Emperor Otto III, Pope Sylvester II, and possibly the Byzantine Emperor Constantine VII, to fabricate the Anno Domini dating system retrospectively, in order to place them at the special year of AD 1000, and to rewrite history to legitimize Otto’s claim to the Holy Roman Empire.

Heribert Illig believed that this was achieved through the alteration, misrepresentation and forgery of documentary and physical evidence. According to this scenario, the entire Carolingian period, including the figure of Charlemagne, is a fabrication, with a “phantom time” of 297 years (AD 614–911) added to the Early Middle Ages.

Remove ads with Anomalien PLUS+

So it is quite possible that we live in 1722, and not in 2019.

Get access to PREMIUM articles, special features and AD FREE experience with Anomalien PLUS+ Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, X (Twitter) and Telegram for BONUS content!
Default image
Jake Carter

Jake Carter is a researcher and a prolific writer who has been fascinated by science and the unexplained since childhood.

He is not afraid to challenge the official narratives and expose the cover-ups and lies that keep us in the dark. He is always eager to share his findings and insights with the readers of anomalien.com, a website he created in 2013.


  1. Its very possible our time is off..forged documents, changing calenders, and also ‘Resets’..There was another country named Tartaria..Believed to had been flooded (mud flood) What happened to it? Why, and when??..Mainly why is it hidden..?
    Ive seen research info that shows newspaper articles about Rome(If I remember correctly, or another Greek city) being totally abandoned in the early 1900’s. There’s nothing in our history about that either.. Our origins and history have been changed and hidden..Wouldnt doubt they changed time as well..

    • One thing about conspiracy theories is that they still need to hold together rationally. That’s something completely absent from the so-called “reset” stories, putting them in league with flat-earth and “Elvis lives” twaddle. The turn of the 20th century was only two lifetimes ago. People alive then took photos, wrote books, letters, and journals, and more importantly interacted with others who’ve lived to the present. If even ONE of the claimed disasters – let alone all of them – had actually happened without detection, the implication is that billions of contemporaneous documents and interactions world-wide were somehow wiped clean and replaced with perfect forgeries. That requires magic, not an alternative explanation of history.

  2. doesn’t add up when confronted with historical evidence. pretty funny to think about, but it isn’t true

    • Battle of Hastings was in 1066, not the period they are referring to here. Could be true, who knows?

Leave a Reply